2015年7月12日星期日

DWDM vs CWDM

DWDM vs CWDM

Definition of wavelength division multiplexing

Early fiber optic transmission systems put information onto strands of glass through simple pulses of light. A light was flashed on and off to represent the "ones" and "zeros" of digital information. The actual light could be of almost any wavelength ( also known as color or frequency ) from roughly 670nm to 1550nm.

During the 1980s, fiber optic data communications modems used low-cost LEDs to put near-infrared pulse onto low-cost fiber. As the need for information increased, the need for bandwidth also increased. Early SONET systems used 1310nm lasers to deliver 155Mb/s data streams over very long distances. But this capacity was quickly exhausted. Advances in optoelectronic components all owed design of systems that simultaneously transmitted multiple wavelengths light over a simple fiber Multiple high-bit rate data streams of 2.5 Gb/s, 10 Gb/s and, more recently, 40 Gb/s and 100Gb/s could be multiplexed through divisions of several wavelengths. And so was born Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM).

CWDM - Coarse Wavelength Division Multiplexing. WDM systems with fewer than eight active wavelengths per fiber.
DWMD - Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing. WDM systems with more than eight active wavelengths per fiber.

Types of WDM

Currently, there are two types of WDM in existence today: Coarse WDM ( CWDM ) and Dense WDM ( DWDM ). Backwards as it may seem, DWDM came well before CWDM, which appeared only after a booming telecommunications market drove prices to affordable lows. Whereas CWDM breaks the spectrum into big chunks, DWDM dices it finely. DWDM fits 40-plus channels into the same frequency range used for two CWDM channels.

CWDM is defined by wavelengths. DWDM is defined in terms of frequencies. DWDM's tighter wavelength spacing fit more channels onto a single fiber, but cost more to implement and operate.

Distinctive CWDM differnces

CWDM can - in principle - carriers to respond flexibly to diverse customer needs in metropolitan regions where fiber may be at a premium. However, it's not really in competition with DWDM as both fulfill distinct roles that largely depend upon carrier-specific circumstances and requirements anyway. The point and purpose of CWDM is short-range frequencies and spreads wavelengths far apart from each other. Standardized channel spacing permits room for wavelength drift as lasers heat up and cool down during operation. By design, CWDM equipment is compact and cost-effective as compared to DWDM designs.

Distinctive DWDM differences

DWDM  is designed for long-haul transmission where wavelengths are packed tightly together. Vendors have found various techniques for cramming 32, 64, or 128 wavelengths into a fiber. When boosted by Erbium Doped-Fiber Amplifiers ( EDFAs ) - a sort of performance enhancer for high -speed communications - these systems can work over thousands of kilometers. Densely packed channels aren't with out their limitations. First, high-precision filters are required to peel away one specific wavelength without interfering with neighboring wavelengths. Those don't come cheap. Second, precision lasers must keep channels exactly on target. That nearly always means such lasers must operate at a constant temperature. High-precision, high- stability lasers are expensive, as are related cooling systems.

CWDM and DWDM scenarios

CWDM doesn't span long distances because its light signal isn't amplified, which keeps costs down but also limits maximum propagation distances. Vendors may cite working ranges of 50 to 80 kilometers, with 160 kilometer distances achievable through signal amplifiers. CWDM supports fewer channels and that may be adequate for metro carriers who prefer to start small and expand later as demand inceases.

Non-amplified signaling systems keep entry costs down and can still retain high loss tolerance. Whenever a non-amplified signal is used, there is a trade-off between capacity and distance. Either you make long networks with fewer nodes or smaller networks with lots of nodes.

Comparison between CWDM and DWDM will be illustrated from the following aspects:

CWDM
DWDM
Defined by wavelengths
Defined by frequencies
Short-range communications
Long-haul transmissions
Uses wide-range frequencies
Narrow frequencies
Wavelengths spread far apart
Tightly packed wavelengths
Wavelength drift is possible
Precision lasers required to keep channels on target
Breaks the spectrum into big chunks
Dices the spectrum into small pieces
Light signal isn't amplified
Signal amplification maybe used

For more information

没有评论:

发表评论